• Original research article
  • March 16, 2012
  • Open access

ARGUMENTATION THEORY WITHIN GENERAL RHETORIC: SYSTEM OR INDEFINITE CHARACTER OF RELATIONS

Abstract

The authors tackle the problem of argumentation theory as a scientific discipline within neo-rhetoric; rhetoric, argumentation and logics correlation; argumentative process multi-aspect character and argumentation communicative efficiency, suggest that in a communicative aspect it is also possible to use an addressee's intention to influence a listener's behavior or consciousness with the purpose to change his (her) point of view or to join a dialogue considering argumentation as the way of the motivation of a speaker and a listener's intellectual cognitive activity having a certain subjective value.

References

  1. Алексеев А. П. Аргументация как объект философского исследования. М., 1995. 149 с.
  2. Брутян Г. А. Очерк теории аргументации. Ереван, 1992. 299 с.
  3. Кириллов В. И. Аргументация в работе лектора. М., 1990. 49 с.
  4. Оганесян С. Г. Предметная область аргументации и основные понятия теории аргументации // Философские проблемы аргументации. Ереван, 1986. С. 14-26.
  5. Уёмов А. И. О типологии философской аргументации: к проблеме её формализации // Философские проблемы аргументации. Ереван, 1986. 216 с.
  6. Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Kruiger T. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht, 1987. 113 р.
  7. Fisher K. Validating Semantic Analyses of Discourse Particles // Journal of Pragmatics. 1998. № 29. P. 75-80.
  8. Perelman Ch. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays and Rhetoric and Application. Dordrecht's, 1979.

Author information

Svetlana Vladimirovna Nachernaya

Tambov State Technical University

Ol'ga Anatol'evna Glivenkova

Tambov State Technical University

About this article

Publication history

  • Published: March 16, 2012.

Keywords

  • аргументация
  • неориторика
  • логика
  • риторика
  • силлогистика
  • аргументативный процесс
  • argumentation
  • neo-rhetoric
  • logics
  • rhetoric
  • syllogistics
  • argumentative process

Copyright

© 2012 The Author(s)
© 2012 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)