• Original research article
  • February 1, 2018
  • Open access

IMPLEMENTATION OF KEY CONCEPTS OF LEGAL DISCOURSE IN TEXTS OF THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE MEDIA (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE CONCEPTS LAW AND RIGHT)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of key concepts of legal discourse LAW and RIGHT from the point of view of their implementation in the English-language media texts. It is established that the concept RIGHT appears to be integrating, and LAW is integrative. Within the same sentence the names of these concepts are objectified in different ways. The principal names of law and right of the concepts LAW and RIGHT are implemented in the argumentative type of texts in the most complete way.

References

  1. Баскакова М. А. Толковый юридический словарь: право и бизнес (русско-английский, англо-русский). Изд-е 8-е, перераб. и доп. М.: Финансы и статистика, 2000. 704 с.
  2. Бритвина К. В. Текстуальные критерии юридического дискурса в современных англоязычных СМИ (на примере концепта LAW (ЗАКОН)) // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. № 5 (71): в 3-х ч. Ч. 1. C. 67-72.
  3. Гурина Р. В., Соколова Е. Е. Фреймовое представление знаний: монография. М.: Народное образование, 2005. 175 с.
  4. Кокова А. В. Иерархическая модель стилистической нормы // Вестник Сургутского государственного педагогического университета. 2015. № 6 (39). C. 67-72.
  5. Кокова А. В. Формирование немецкого газетно-публицистического стиля в XIX столетии (информативная функция) // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2015. № 11 (53): в 3-х ч. Ч. 1. С. 105-107.
  6. Палашевская И. В. Концепт «закон» в английской и русской лингвокультурах: дисс. … к. филол. н. Волгоград, 2001. 196 с.
  7. Яцко В. В. Системные связи в концептосфере шведского политического дискурса // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2015. № 9 (51): в 2-х ч. Ч. 2. C. 215-217.
  8. Baldwin C. Will Human Rights Still Be Protected After UK Brexit? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.hrw. org/news/2017/07/18/will-human-rights-still-be-protected-after-uk-brexit (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  9. Bowcott O. Employers' rights to monitor office emails to be decided by European court [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 4 September. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/sep/04/european-court-human-rights-strasbourg-to-rule-on-workplace-privacy-test-case (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  10. Brennan F. Religious freedom is an important right. Once same sex-marriage is legal, it must be protected [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 17 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/17/religious-freedom-is-an-important-right-once-same-sex-marriage-is-legal-it-must-be-protected (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  11. Collin P. H. Dictionary of Law. 4th edition. London: Bloomsbury, 2004. 337 p.
  12. Critics claim new storage law could expose personal data to intelligence agents [Электронный ресурс] // Independent. 2017. 26 September. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/russia-facebook-ban-putin-data-local-storage-threat-a7968711.html (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  13. Fenton S. Theresa May must get second Brexit Act through Parliament after EU negotiations, lawyers conclude [Электронный ресурс] // Independent. 2017. 17 February. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-must-get-second-brexit-act-through-parliament-after-eu-negotiations-lawyers-conclude-a7586506.html (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  14. Forster K. Brexit: Lawyers warn of industry influence over public health laws as EU “fundamental right” is axed [Электронный ресурс] // Independent. 2017. 2 May. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/brexit-latest-news-repeal-law-public-health-threat-warning-fundamental-right-eu-charter-uk-law-white-a7714081.html (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  15. Funk & Wagnalls new standard dictionary of the English language. N. Y. - London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1931. 2813 p.
  16. Gilman D. The US deportation system is verging on lawlessness [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 23 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/23/immigration-crisis-us-deportation-system-lawlessness-trump-administration (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  17. Helm T. Breaking with the European court of justice won’t be easy for Britain [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 19 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/aug/19/european-court-of-justice-brexit-theresa-may (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  18. Lambert M. Austerity has trampled over disabled people’s rights. But the UK won’t admit it [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 4 September. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/04/austerity-disabled-people-rights-uk-un-government (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  19. Martin E. A. Oxford Dictionary of Law. 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 1551 p.
  20. Random House unabridged dictionary. N. Y.: Random House, 1993. 2478 p.
  21. Roberts D. UK offers climbdown on European courts deciding cross-border cases [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 21 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/aug/21/brexit-paper-backs-away-from-pms-promise-of-judicial-independence (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  22. Spain: Migrants Held in Poor Conditions [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/07/31/spain-migrants-held-poor-conditions (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  23. Summers H. “They convicted me of nothing”: freed Sudanese rights activist vows to fight on [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 2 September. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/sep/02/they-convicted-me-of-nothing-freed-sudanese-human-rights-activist-mudawi-ibrahim-adam (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  24. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language / ed. by W. Morris. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981. 1550 p.
  25. The universal English dictionary / ed. by H. C. Wyld. L.: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970. 1447 p.
  26. Theresa May Should Defend, Not Denigrate, Human Rights [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.hrw.org/ news/2017/06/09/theresa-may-should-defend-not-denigrate-human-rights (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  27. Webster's encyclopedic unabridged dictionary of the English language. N. Y.: Gramercy books, 1994. 1854 p.
  28. Webster’s third new international dictionary. Springfield: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 1986. 2662 p.
  29. Wildbore H. “Give us back our values”: how to use human rights law in social work [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. 2017. 4 September. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2017/sep/04/use-human-rights-law-social-work (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).
  30. Wilts A. Georgetown law professors kneel in protest at Jeff Sessions speech [Электронный ресурс] // Independent. 2017. 26 September. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/georgetown-lawyers-take-knee-trump-sessions-protest-washington-a7969056.html (дата обращения: 09.12.2017).

Author information

Kristina Vasil'evna Britvina

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University

About this article

Publication history

  • Published: February 1, 2018.

Keywords

  • концепт
  • юридический дискурс
  • понятийная составляющая
  • закон
  • субъективное право
  • дескриптивный текст
  • экспликативный текст
  • аргументативный текст
  • англоязычные СМИ
  • concept
  • legal discourse
  • conceptual component
  • law
  • subjective right
  • descriptive text
  • explicative text
  • argumentative text
  • English-language media

Copyright

© 2018 The Author(s)
© 2018 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)