Quantitative Analysis of Hedges Distribution across Scientific Article Sections (by the Material of the English Language)

Abstract

The article considers the phenomenon of hedging as a means of scientific communication which allows the researcher to express his attitude to submitted information. The paper aims to reveal the principles of hedges distribution across scientific article sections. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that hedging in academic writing is still poorly investigated. Relying on the conducted quantitative analysis the author concludes that hedges are unequally distributed across scientific article sections, their frequency depends on section purpose. The maximum concentration of hedges is observed in “Discussion” section, because this section is most vulnerable to criticism. As a result, it is proved that hedging allows the researcher to reduce his responsibility for submitted information.

References

1. Баранов А. Н. Введение в прикладную лингвистику. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2009.
2. Дейк Т. А. ван. Язык, познание, коммуникация. М.: Прогресс, 1989.
3. Захаров В. П., Богданова С. Ю. Корпусная лингвистика. СПб.: Изд-во С. Петерб. ун-та, 2020.
4. Кожина М. Н. О диалогичности письменной научной речи. Пермь: ПГУ, 1986.
5. Маслов Б. А. Проблемы лингвистического анализа связного текста. Таллин: Изд-во Таллинского пединститута, 1975.
6. Разинкина Н. М. Стилистика английского научного текста. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2009.
7. Сметанина-Болдвин Ю. В. Коммуникативные тактики хеджирования в современном англоязычном медицинском дискурсе доктор-пациент // Вестник Пятигорского государственного лингвистического университета. 2009. № 3.
8. Темирбулатова А. С. Хеджирование как прагматический показатель точности в научном тексте // Успехи современной науки. 2017. Т. 3. № 4.
9. Clemen G. The Concept of Hedging: Origins, Approaches and Definitions // Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts / ed. by H. Schroeder, R. Markkanen. Berlin - N. Y.: de Gruyter, 1997.
10. Halliday M. A. K. Explorations in the Functions of Language. L.: Arnold, 1973.
11. Hyland K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998.
12. Lakoff G. Hedges: A Study of Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1972. № 2.
13. Namsaraev V. Hedging in Russian Academic Writing in Sociological Texts // Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts / ed. by H. Schroder, R. Markkanen. Berlin - N. Y.: de Gruyter, 1997.
14. Prince E., Frader J., Bosk C. On Hedging in Physician-Physician Discourse // Linguistics and the Professions / ed. by R. J. di Pietro. Norwood: Ablex, 1982.
15. Salager-Meyer F. Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse // English for Specific Purposes. 1994. Vol. 13. № 2.
16. Swales J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: September 9, 2021.
• Published: October 29, 2021.

Keywords

• корпус текстов
• модальные глаголы
• научная коммуникация
• научная статья
• научный текст
• text corpus
• modal verbs
• scientific communication
• scientific article
• scientific text

Copyright

© 2021 The Author(s)
© 2021 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)