• Original research article
  • March 31, 2022
  • Open access

Relation between Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Turkish and Japanese

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to identify the features characterising the correlation between epistemic modality and evidentiality in Turkish and Japanese. The relationship between epistemic modality and evidentiality is one of the most ambiguous issues when considering evidentiality. Just as the category of evidentiality manifests itself differently in each language, so the issue of the correlation between epis-temic modality and evidentiality has a special solution in each language. Scientific novelty of the paper lies in conducting a comparative study of the said issue in Turkish and Japanese. We have not found any studies that address the issue of the correlation between epistemic modality and evidentiality in the Japanese and Turkish languages in a comparative aspect. The available research on Japanese or Turkish is often contradictory: the definition of admirativity in Turkish, the identification of markers of epistemic modality and evidentiality in Japanese - these issues cause a lot of controversy. As a result, it has been proved that the interaction of the two categories is particularly evident in the Turkish language when using inferential evidentiality; in the Japanese language, it is the case when it comes to hearsay evidentiality. The inte-raction of the two categories generates a new meaning of evidentiality in the Turkish language, i.e. mirativity.

References

  1. Алпатов В. М., Аркадьев П. М., Подлесская В. И. Теоретическая грамматика японского языка. М.: Наталис, 2008.
  2. Гузев В. Г. Теоретическая грамматика турецкого языка. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2015.
  3. Каксин А. Д. Средства выражения эвиденциальности и миративности в контексте дискурсивного исследования // Коммуникативные исследования. 2014. № 1.
  4. Майсак Т. А., Тетевосов С. Г. Пространство говорящего в категориях грамматики, или Чего нельзя сказать о себе самом // Вопросы языкознания. 2000. № 5.
  5. Мельчук И. А. Курс общей морфологии: в 5-ти т. М. - Вена: Языки русской культуры; Венский славистический альманах, 1998. Т. 2.
  6. Ницолова Р. Семантическая гиперкатегория «Характеристика говорящим сообщаемой информации» и ее связь с временем и лицом глагола // Грамматические категории: иерархии, связи, взаимодействие: мат. Междунар. науч. конф. СПб., 2003.
  7. Плунгян В. А. Введение в грамматическую семантику: грамматические значения и грамматические системы языков мира. 2011. URL: https://kzref.org/v-a-plungyan-vvedenie-v-grammaticheskuyu-semantiku-grammatiche.html?page=25
  8. Скрибник Е. К., Зезинг О. А. К описанию эвиденциальности и миративности в калмыцком языке // Вопросы языкознания. 2012. № 4.
  9. Хафизова И. И., Шафигуллина Л. Ш. Эвиденциальность пересказывательности в турецком и японском языках // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2021. Т. 14. Вып. 5.
  10. Aikhenvald A. I. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  11. Asano Y. A Semantic Analysis of Epistemic Modality in Japanese. Canberra, 2003.
  12. Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago - L., 1994.
  13. Imtihani N. An Overview of Japanese Modalities and Their Degree of Proposition // Humaniora. 2009. Vol. 21. Iss. 1.
  14. Larm L. Modality Packaging in Japanese: The Encoding of Modal Meanings and Subjectivity // Studies in Pragmatics. 2014. Vol. 16.
  15. Oswalt R. L. The Evidential System in Kashaya // Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology in Language. Norwood, 1986.
  16. Palmer F. R. Mood and Modality. Cambridge, 1986.
  17. Seçkin A. When the Owner of Information is Unsure: Epistemic Uncertainty Influences Evidentiality Processing in Turkish // Lingua. 2020. Vol. 247.
  18. Üzüm M. Epistemik kiplik işaretleyicilerinin söz dizimsel özellikleri Özbek ve Türkiye Türkçesi // Türkoloji Dergisi. 2019. Vol. 23. № 2.
  19. Willet Th. A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality // Studies in Language. 1988. Vol. 12. Iss. 1.

Author information

Ilseyar Ilgamovna Khafizova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Elmira Kamilevna Khabibullina

PhD

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

About this article

Publication history

  • Received: January 24, 2022.
  • Published: March 31, 2022.

Keywords

  • эпистемическая модальность
  • эвиденциальность
  • турецкий язык
  • японский язык
  • epistemic modality
  • evidentiality
  • Turkish language
  • Japanese language

Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s)
© 2022 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)