• Original research article
  • September 1, 2025
  • Open access

Gender representation through the lens of comparative structures in contemporary English-language women’s prose

Abstract

The aim of the research is to identify patterns in the representation of gender through comparative structures (similes and metaphors) in texts of contemporary English-language women’s prose. The work focuses on analyzing the figurative paradigms formed by stable associations between the comparadum (X-element, representing a gender characteristic) and the comparate (Y-element, the image of comparison). The scientific novelty lies in the integration of methods from gender linguistics, corpus analysis, and cognitive poetics to systematize invariants of these paradigms. For the first time, based on 1481 comparisons (483 masculine, 998 feminine), asymmetric representation models reflecting cultural stereotypes have been identified. The results showed an asymmetry in thematic focuses (feminine comparisons cover a wider range of characteristics (appearance, emotions, thinking), while masculine comparisons are reduced to appearance and actions); dominant paradigms (for women: Woman → Artifact, Woman → Fauna; for men: Man → Fauna, Man → Artifact); and cultural specifics: feminine comparisons exploit mythopoetics (mermaids, goddesses – 3.3 times more often), while masculine comparisons exploit functionality. The research confirms that comparison in a literary text serves as a tool for constructing gender stereotypes. Invariant paradigms (for example, Woman → Flora, which occurs 4.7 times more often) reflect culturally determined cognitive models.

Research materials

  1. Словарь лингвистических терминов / под ред. О. С. Ахмановой. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1966.

References

  1. Арнольд И. В. Стилистика. Современный английский язык. М.: Флинта; Наука, 2002.
  2. Виноградов В. В. Стилистика. Теория поэтической речи. Поэтика. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1963.
  3. Казаков А. В. Образные средства и парадигматические ряды образов с названиями частей тела в современном английском языке: автореф. дисс. … к. филол. н. М., 2004.
  4. Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем / пер. А. Н. Баранова. М.: УРСС Эдиториал, 2004.
  5. Мезенин С. М. Образность как лингвистическая категория // Вопросы языкознания. 1983. № 6.
  6. Павлович Н. В. Язык образов. Парадигмы образов в русском поэтическом языке. М.: Наука, 1995.
  7. Солганик Г. Я. Стилистика современного русского языка и культура речи. М.: Academia, 2005.
  8. Gibbs R. W. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844
  9. Hussein R. F., Sawalha M. A Corpus-based Study of Similes in British and American English // Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 2016. Vol. 7. № 2. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no2.4
  10. Kövecses Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  11. Littlemore J. Metaphor and Embodied Cognition: Language, the Body, and the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  12. Martynyuk A., Akhmedova E. (Sub)cultural specificity of fiction simile and the choice of translation strategy // Topics in Linguistics. 2022. № 23 (2). https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0011
  13. Oleniak M. Semantic representation of similes (based on the Ukrainian, English and Polish languages) // Topics in Linguistics. 2018. № 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2018-0002
  14. Steen G. The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! // Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 2011. № 9 (1).
  15. Steen G. Understanding Metaphor in Literature. L. – N. Y.: Longman, 1994.
  16. Ullah S., Zahra T., Khan F., Ahmad A. Exploring Simile in Political Speeches through Corpus Techniques // PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 2021. № 18 (4).

Author information

Olga Viktorovna Gergel

PhD

M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University, Ufa

About this article

Publication history

  • Received: July 23, 2025.
  • Published: September 1, 2025.

Keywords

  • репрезентация гендера
  • образные парадигмы сравнений
  • сравнение в художественном тексте
  • компарат
  • компарадум
  • gender representation
  • figurative paradigms of comparisons
  • comparison in literary text
  • comparate
  • comparadum

Copyright

© 2025 The Author(s)
© 2025 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)