• Original research article
  • November 19, 2014
  • Open access

TRICHOTOMIC PERIOD IN HISTORY OF STUDYING COMPOSITE SENTENCE IN THE ENGLISH GRAMMAR

Abstract

The paper provides an analysis of the classification of composite sentences from the viewpoint of trichotomic approach in the English grammatical tradition, according to which the analyzed syntactic constructions were subdivided into complex and compound sentences, the former of which, in their turn, are considered either in the structure of a simple sentence (similarly to the subdivision of arguments in formal logic) or as a variant of a composite one. The differentiation of clauses (nouns, adjectives and adverbial) is developed on the basis of morphological principle (i.e. by analogy with the parts of speech they stand for).

References

  1. Arnauld A. et Lancelot C. Grammaire générale et raisonnée du Port-Royal, par Arnauld et Lancelot; précédée dʹun Essai sur lʹorigine et les progrés de la langue francoise, par M. Petitot, et suive du Commentaire de M. Duclos, auquel on a ajouté des notes. Paris, 1803 (1 er éd. 1600). 470 p.
  2. Arnauld A. et Nicole P. La logique, ou, L'art de penser, contenant, outre les regles communes, plusieurs observations nouvelles, propres à former le jugement. Nouvelle edition, revûe & corrigée. Paris, 1752 (1 er éd. 1662). 427 p.
  3. Bain A. A Higher English Grammar. London: Longmans and Сo., 1879. 358 p.
  4. Brooke Ch. The Oxford and Cambridge Grammar and Analysis of the English Language (with numerous exercises, illustrations, critical notes and examination questions). New edition. London, 1898. 192 p.
  5. Davidson W., Alcock J. С. English Grammar and Analysis. New edition, with considerable additions. London: Allman and Son, Ltd, 1899. 300 p.
  6. Doherty H. An Introduction to English Grammar, on Universal Principles. London, 1841. 240 p.
  7. Lennie W. The Principles of English Grammar, Comprising the Substance of All the Most Approved English Grammars Extant, Briefly Defined and Neatly Arranged, with Copious Exercises in Parsing and Syntax. Edinburgh: Oliver a. Boyd. 8th edition, 1879, (2nd ed. 1812). 179 p.
  8. Morell J. D. The New Morell: A grammar of the English language based on the work of the late J. D. Morell, M. A., LLD, one of her Majesty׳s inspectors of schools. Rewritten under the revision of P. A. Barnett, M. A. London, 1893. 256 p.
  9. Onions Gh. T. An Advanced English Syntax: based on the Principles and Requirements of the Grammatical Society. 6 edition. London - N. Y.: Kegan Paul; French. Trubner and co.; Macmillan, 1932 (1st ed. - 1904). 166 p.
  10. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech J., Svartvik I. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman, 1972. 1120 p.
  11. Sweet H. A New English Grammar. Logical and Historical. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1900, 1930. Part I. Introduction, phonology and accidence; Part II. Syntax. 636 p.
  12. Watts I. Logick: or the right use of reason in the enquiry after truth (with a variety of rules to guard against error in the affairs of religion and human life as well as in the sciences. 8 ed., corrected. London, 1745. 365 p.

Author information

Fatima Akhsarbekovna Tsarikaeva

North Ossetian State University named after K. L. Khetagurov

About this article

Publication history

  • Published: November 19, 2014.

Keywords

  • английский язык
  • грамматика
  • синтаксис
  • сложное предложение
  • комплексное предложение
  • предикативная единица
  • независимая часть
  • зависимая часть
  • союз
  • the English language
  • grammar
  • syntax
  • composite sentence
  • complex sentence
  • predicative unit
  • independent part
  • dependent part
  • conjunction

Copyright

© 2014 The Author(s)
© 2014 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)