• Original research article
  • November 1, 2018
  • Open access

LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL, SYNTACTICAL AND STRUCTURAL MISTAKES MADE BY SENIOR MEDICAL STUDENTS IN ABSTRACTS FOR GRADUATE QUALIFICATION WORKS

Abstract

The article provides the linguistic and rhetorical analysis of the mistakes made by medical students in the English abstracts. For the first time the academic abstract texts created by the native speakers of Russian are introduced into the paradigm of the academic genre study. The analysis has allowed the author to classify the students’ mistakes into groups according to their statistical value: lexico-grammatical, syntactical, stylistic and structural ones. The research findings can be used when compiling subject-oriented courses on academic English writing.

References

  1. Добрынина О. Л. Обучение академическому письму на английском языке: написание abstract к научной статье // Непрерывное образование (опыт Петрозаводского государственного университета): сборник статей / под ред. Т. А. Бабакова. Петрозаводск, 2016. С. 1-12.
  2. Короткина И. Б. Университетские центры академического письма в России: цели и перспективы // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 1. С. 75-86.
  3. Шимановская Л. А. Анализ типичных ошибок в аннотациях на английском языке к научным статьям по проблемам инженерной экологии // Вестник Казанского технологического университета. 2013. Т. 16. № 13. С. 287-292.
  4. Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р. Создание академического текста: учебное пособие для студентов и преподавателей вузов. М.: ООО «Вариант»; ЦСПГИ, 2013. 156 с.
  5. Álvareza M., Boillosb M. M., Velasco E. The process of building the abstract of a paper in the context of a writing workshop for PhDs // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 178. P. 2-8.
  6. Ansarifar A., Shahriari H., Pishghadam R. Phrasal complexity in academic writing: а comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2018. № 31. P. 58-71.
  7. Biber D., Gray B. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use // English Language and Linguistics. 2011. Vol. 15. Iss. 2. P. 223-250.
  8. Cohen-Vida M. I. How to teach writing abstracts in a foreign language? // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 46. P. 4981-4985.
  9. Daud D. How to write a scientific abstract: a guide for medical students. Newcastle: University of Newcastle, 2013. 4 p.
  10. Ellis R. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 387 p.
  11. Harris M. J. Three Steps to Teaching Abstract and Critique Writing // International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2006. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 136-146.
  12. Hu G., Cao F. Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: а comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals // Journal of Pragmatics. 2011. Vol. 43 (11). P. 2795-2809.
  13. Klimova B. F. Common mistakes in writing abstracts in English // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013. Vol. 93. P. 512-516.
  14. Klimova B. F. Teaching English Abstract Writing Effectively // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 186. P. 908-912.
  15. Norris J. M., Ortega L. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity // Applied Linguistics. 2009. № 30 (4). P. 555-578.
  16. Publication manual of the American psychological association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2010. 272 p.
  17. Weinstein R. How to Write an Abstract and Present It at the Annual Meeting // Journal of Clinical Apheresis. 1999. Vol. 14 (4). P. 195-199.

Author information

Ivan Vadimovich Grigor'ev

Saint Petersburg University

About this article

Publication history

  • Received: September 15, 2018.
  • Published: November 1, 2018.

Keywords

  • аннотации
  • прикладная лингвистика
  • жанры академического письма
  • интерференция
  • синтаксическая сложность
  • риторические нарушения
  • статистическое ранжирование
  • abstracts
  • applied linguistics
  • academic writing genres
  • interference
  • syntactical difficulty
  • rhetorical mistakes
  • statistical ranking

Copyright

© 2018 The Author(s)
© 2018 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)