Voice onset time in plosive occlusives in the oral speech of monolinguals in Russia

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the features of unvoiced and voiced plosive occlusives realised in the speech of monolinguals in Russia when reading a phonetically representative text aloud. It should be noted that the study is novel in that it is the first in Russian linguistics to use the parameter of voice onset time (VOT) to determine the voicing/devoicing of plosive occlusives. The authors consider VOT to be the most reliable acoustic parameter. As a result of the study, it was found that in the speech of Russian monolinguals, VOT was most often implemented incorrectly (positive VOT instead of negative), which is especially exemplified by the material of words starting with the sound [d] and one word in the speech of mostly adults, which is associated with speech fluency. The presence of pauses helped children to pronounce unvoiced and voiced consonants more correctly. Unvoiced consonants were pronounced instead of voiced ones in the speech of adult monolinguals. It should be said that other trends were noted in the speech of bilinguals. Basically, the range of voicing did not correspond to the reference values in both languages (Russian and German). Bilingual adults and children had their own system of parameters. As for unvoiced consonants, their values almost completely corresponded to the reference values of the Russian language, except for the consonant /k/.

References

1. Диттмерс Т. И. Реализация глухих и звонких смычных согласных в немецко-русском языковом контакте: время начала озвончения // Проблемы онтолингвистики – 2017. Освоение и функционирование языка в ситуации многоязычия: мат. ежегод. междунар. науч. конф. (г. Санкт-Петербург, 26-28 июня 2017 г.) / под ред. Т. А. Кругляковой, М. А. Еливановой, Т. А. Ушаковой. Иваново: Листос, 2017.
2. Лыпкань Т. В. Динамика фонетических межпоколенческих изменений глухости и звонкости смычных взрывных согласных в русской речи билингвов Германии // Филологические науки: научные доклады высшей школы. 2022. № S6. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6s-22.010
3. Лыпкань Т. В., Хромов С. С. Глухость – звонкость смычных взрывных согласных в русской речи взрослых-билингвов в Германии // Филологические науки: научные доклады высшей школы. 2020. № 1. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.1-20.025
4. Степанова С. Б. Фонетические свойства русской речи: реализация и транскрипция: автореф. дисс. ... к. филол. н. Л., 1988.
5. Фонетический аспект общения на неродном языке: коллективная монография / науч. ред. Н. А. Любимова. СПб.: Филологический факультет СПбГУ, 2006.
6. Шевченко Т. И., Бурая Е. А., Галочкина И. Е., Кузьмина М. О., Сокорева Т. В., Федотова М. В. Социофонетические методы анализа звучащей речи: учеб. пособие для бакалавров, магистров, аспирантов, обучающихся по специальностям направления «Лингвистика». Дубна: Феникс+, 2015.
7. Ashby P. Understanding Phonetics. L. – N. Y.: Taylor and Francis Group, 2011.
8. Barry S. M. E. Variation in Vocal Fold Vibration during Voiced Obstruents in Russian // European Journal of Disorders of Communication. 1995. Vol. 30 (2). https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509082523
9. Beckman J., Jessen M., Ringen C. Empirical Evidence for Laryngeal Features: Aspirating vs. True Voice Languages // Journal of Linguistics. 2013. Vol. 49 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000424
10. Braun А. Zur regionalen Distribution von VOT im Deutschen // Untersuchungen zu Stimme und Sprache / hrsg. von A. Braun. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1996.
11. Brehmer B., Kurbangulova T. Lost in Transmission? Family Language Input and Its Role for the Development of Russian as a Heritage Language in Germany // Integration, Identity and Language Maintenance in Young Immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians / ed. by L. Isurin, C. M. Riehl. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017.
12. Cho T., Ladefoged P. Variation and Universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 Languages // Journal of Phonetics. 1999. No. 27.
13. Flege J. The Production of “New” and “Similar” Phones in a Foreign Language: Evidence for the Effect of Equivalence Classification // Journal of Phonetics. 1987. No. 15.
14. Lisker L., Abramson A. S. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurement // Word. 1964. Vol. 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
15. Ringen C., Kulikov V. Voicing in Russian Stops: Cross-Linguistic Implications // Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 2012. Vol. 20 (2).

Funding

The reported study was funded by the RSF, project No. 21-48-04401 “Russian in Germany across generations”.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: July 10, 2023.
• Published: August 30, 2023.

Keywords

• время начала озвончения
• глухие и звонкие взрывные смычные согласные
• межъязыковая фонетическая интерференция
• русскоязычные монолингвы России
• voice onset time
• unvoiced and voiced plosive occlusives
• interlanguage phonetic interference
• Russian-speaking monolinguals of Russia

Copyright

© 2023 The Author(s)
© 2023 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)