Identifying intonation features and politeness strategies in classroom language

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the phonopragmatic analysis of the communicative styles of BA students in teaching and CELTA candidates. The focus is made on classroom management and prosodic characteristics used in the speech of two groups of non-native informants. We aim to find the connection of speakers’ national identity and language teaching. Regarding pronunciation as part of a person’s identity, the authors carry out a comparative analysis of English and Russian cultures and examine linguistic and paralinguistic expression of national indexical features in communication. Singling out the strategies that allow teachers to carry out classroom interactions with their students, identifying the correlation of classroom interaction language and speech prosody with politeness strategies provide the novelty of the research. We clearly stated that conventionality of classroom language discourse varied at the level of prosody and reflected national specific characteristics in the speech of a foreign language teacher. Due to perceptive and analytical methods of analysis, we recognized that CELTA candidates follow standardized teaching framework requirements, whilst future language teachers demonstrate the influence of native language interference to a greater degree. The findings show that the tendencies that reveal the status inequality in classroom interactions between teachers and students are in the choice of prosodic features and language construction. University students in teaching realize strategies of positive politeness culture typical of their own Russian culture; in the group of CELTA candidates the level of phonetic competence and personal experience is higher thus they choose phonetic features characteristic of negative politeness culture.

References

1. Брызгунова Е. А. Эмоционально-стилистические различия русской звучащей речи. М., 1984.
2. Вишневская Г. М., Левина Т. М. Английская супрасегментная фонетика: учеб. пособие. Иваново: Изд-во ИвГУ, 2007.
3. Иванова Ю. Е. Компаративный анализ лингвокультурологических особенностей дискуссии в англоязычном и русскоязычном полилоговом общении // Язык и культура. 2019. № 48. https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/48/9
4. Иванова Ю. Е. Просодические характеристики наречий-интенсификаторов в современной деловой английской речи: экспериментально-фонетическое исследование на материале американского варианта английского языка: дисс. … к. филол. н. Иваново, 2001.
5. Ларина Т. В. Англичане и русские. Язык, культура, коммуникация. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2013.
6. Ларина Т. В. Категория вежливости в английской и русской коммуникативных культурах: монография. М., 2003.
7. Ларина Т. В. Категория вежливости и стиль коммуникации: сопоставление английских и русских лингвокультурных традиций. М.: Рукописные памятники Древней Руси, 2009.
8. Михалёва Е. И. Корреляция психологического типа личности с просодическими средствами // Традиции и инновации в лингвистике и литературоведении: межкаф. сборник науч. статей / науч. ред. К. М. Баранова, О. Г. Чупрына. М.: Московский государственный областной университет, 2018.
9. Михалёва Е. И. Место диалектной речи в фонетической системе английского языка // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2012. № 1 (9).
10. Янко Т. Е. Интонационные стратегии русской речи в сопоставительном аспекте. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2008.
11. Alabdali T. S. Revisiting Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory: A Middle Eastern Perspective // Bulletin of Advanced English Studies. 2019. Vol. 2 (2).
12. Block D. Second Language Identities. L.: Continuum, 2007.
13. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
14. Couper-Kuhlen E. An Introduction to English Prosody. L.: Edward Arnold, 1986.
15. Cruttenden A.Intonation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
16. Crystal D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
17. Culpeper J. Impoliteness Strategies // Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society / ed. by A. Capone, J. L. Mey. Cham: Springer, 2016.
18. Culpeper J., Kan Q.Communicative Styles, Rapport and Student Engagement: An Online Peer Mentoring Scheme // Applied Linguistics. 2019. Vol. 41. Iss. 5.
19. Fukushima S. In Search of Another Understanding of Politeness: From the Perspective of Attentiveness // Journal of Politeness Research. 2015. Vol. 11 (5).
20. Fukushima S. Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Peter Lang, 2000.
21. Guiora A. Z., Brannon R. C. L., Dull C. Y. Empathy and Second Language Learning // Language Learning. A Journal of Research in Language Studies. 1972. Vol. 22. Iss. 1.
22. Haugh M. Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 58.
23. Haugh M., Kádár D., Mills S.Interpersonal Pragmatics: Issues and Debates // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 58.
24. Ivanova Y. E., Mikhaleva E. I. The Role of Prosody in Expressing Culture-specific Speech Behaviour of Language Teachers in English // Training, Language and Culture. 2022. Vol. 6 (1).
25. Ivanova Y. E., Mikhaleva E. I., Efimenko T. N.Internationalization of Stand-up Comedians’ Speech Behaviour: Loss of National Identity? // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Conference Proceedings. L., 2020.
26. Ladd R.Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
27. Lambert W. E., Tucker G. R. Sociocultural Aspects of Language Study // Focus on the Learner: Pragmatic Perspectives for the Language Teacher / ed. by J. W. Oller, J. C. Richards. Rowley: Newbury House, 1973.
28. Roach P. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
29. Schauer G. A., Culpeper J., Marti L., Nevala M., Meilian M. Impoliteness and Emotions in a Cross-Cultural Perspective // SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature. 2014. Vol. 30.
30. Sinkevičiūtė V. A Comparative Analysis of Politeness in First Encounter Conversations in British English Film and Peninsular Spanish Film // Lexis. 2010. HS 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.820
31. Spencer-Oatey H. Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport // Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory / ed. by H. Spencer-Oatey. 2nd ed. L. – N. Y.: Continuum, 2008.
32. Wells J. C. English Intonation.Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: July 21, 2023.
• Published: November 1, 2023.

Keywords

• classroom language
• phonetic competence
• politeness strategies
• phonopragmatics
• national identity
• речь учителя
• фонетическая компетенция
• стратегии вежливости
• фонопрагматика
• национальная идентичность

Copyright

© 2023 The Author(s)
© 2023 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)