The topology-imagery of lexical basic and metaphorical meanings: the cases of Words of the Year in English, Chinese, and Russian

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the distribution of cognitive and perceptual information (CPI) in metaphorical meanings of Words of the Year in English, Chinese, and Russian and their underlying topological patterns. The novelty of this research lies in explaining cognitive and perceptual information in lexical semantics based on the topology-imagery hypothesis, offering a new cognitive perspective on lexical semantic understanding. By annotating the CPI types of Words of the Year in English, Chinese, and Russian over a span of ten consecutive years, this study compares the cognitive similarities and differences in metaphorical meanings across these languages and explores the underlying cognitive image-schematic patterns behind these similarities and differences. The findings reveal that five types of cognitive and perceptual information constitute the core cognitive mechanisms in the semantic relationships between basic and metaphorical meanings, with structural relationships (Type 3) emerging as a core cognitive pattern across these languages. Furthermore, the study identifies structural relationships (Type 3) and scenarios (Type 4) as the most prevalent types within English, Chinese, and Russian Words of the Year. Underlying cognitive and perceptual information are two topological patterns identified as universal methods for understanding lexical semantics.

References

1. Fauconnier G., Turner M. Mental spaces: Conceptual integration networks // Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
2. Gibbs R. W. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
3. Gibbs R. W., Herbert L. C. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations // Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
4. Kövecses Z. Metaphor in Culture. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
5. Lakoff G. Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014. Т. 8. № 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
6. Lakoff G. The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? // Cognitive Linguistics. 1990. Т. 1. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
7. Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
8. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
9. Landau B., Jackendoff R. “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1993. Т. 16. № 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00029733
10. Landau B., Lakusta L. Spatial language and spatial representation // Space in Languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.18lan
11. Langacker R. W. Conceptualization, Symbolization, and Grammar // The New Psychology of Language / ed. by M. Tomasello. Psychology Press, 2014.
12. Langacker R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar // Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press, 1987. Vol. 1.
13. Langacker R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar // Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press, 1991. Vol. 2.
14. Levinson S. C. Language and space // Annual Review of Anthropology. 1996. Т. 25. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353
15. Palmer G. B. Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University Of Texas Press, 1999.
16. Palmer G. B., Thompson J., Parkin J., Harmon E. The Ceremonial Origins of Language // Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274823_7
17. Pishghadam R., Jajarmi H., Shayesteh S. Conceptualizing sensory relativism in light of emotioncy: A movement beyond linguistic relativism // International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 2016. Vol. 4. № 2.
18. Regier T. A model of the human capacity for categorizing spatial relations // Cognitive Linguistics. 1995. Т. 6. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.63
19. Robert S. Words and their meanings // From Polysemy to Semantic Change Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations / ed. by M. Vanhove. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008.
20. Sharifian F. Advances in Cultural Linguistics // Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition / ed. M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, B. Blountю London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
21. Talmy L. Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation // Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1991. Т. 17. № 1. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
22. Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press, 2000.
23. Vicente A. Polysemy and word meaning: an account of lexical meaning for different kinds of content words // Philosophical Studies. 2018. Т. 175. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0900-y
24. Williams J. M. Synaesthetic Adjectives: A Possible Law of Semantic Change // Language. 1976. Т. 52. № 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/412571
25. Zhao Q., Huang C.-R., Ahrens K. Directionality of linguistic synesthesia in Mandarin: A corpus-based study // Lingua. 2019. Т. 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102744
26. 季羡林. “天人合一”新解 // 传统文化与现代化. 1993. № 1 (Ji Xianlin. A New Interpretation of the Unity of Heaven and Man // Traditional Culture and Modernization. 1993. № 1).

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: May 10, 2024.
• Published: July 22, 2024.

Keywords

• когнитивная и перцептивная информация
• метафорические значения слов года
• когнитивные схемы-образы
• лексическая семантической информации
• топология-образность
• cognitive and perceptual information
• metaphorical meanings of the words of the year
• cognitive schemes-images
• lexical semantic information
• topology-imagery

Copyright

© 2024 The Author(s)
© 2024 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)