ANALYSIS OF MASS MEDIA IDEOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF CRITICAL PARADIGM: KEY PROBLEMS

Abstract

The study of mass media ideology was carried out by four basic critical schools. Analyzing their scientific works the author identifies the four key problems concerning mass media ideology in the context of critical paradigm: 1) mass media commodification in ideology reproduction; 2) mass communication technologies as a new kind of ideology generator; 3) symbolic mass media generation in ideology circulation; and 4) audience’s perception of media-message as an ideological competition. Only considering the interaction of all of these aspects the modern science can provide a comprehensive approach to the mentioned problem.

References

1. Бойд-Барретта О. Подходы к «новому» исследованию аудитории // Подходы к медиа: хрестоматия. Пекин: Синьхуа, 2004. С. 615-622.
2. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Немецкая идеология // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф., Сочинения: в 50-ти т. Изд-е 2-е. М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955. Т. 3. С. 7-544.
3. Маркузе Г. Одномерный человек. М.: REFL-book, 1994. 368 с.
4. Реале Дж., Антисери Д. Западная философия от истоков до наших дней: в 4-х т. СПб.: Петрополис, 1997. Т. 4. От романтизма до наших дней. 850 с.
5. Хабермас Ю. Техника и наука как «идеология». М.: Праксис, 2007. 208 с.
6. Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. Диалектика просвещения. М.: Медиум, 1997. 314 с.
7. Corner J. “Ideology” and Media Research // Media, Culture & Society. 2016. № 2 (38). Р. 265-273.
8. Curran J. Media and Power. L.: Routledge, 2002. 308 р.
9. Dijk T. A., van. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse & Society. 1993. Vol. 4 (2). Р. 249-283.
10. Downey J., Titley G., Toynbee J. Ideology Critique: the Challenge for Media Studies // Media, Culture & Society. 2014. № 6 (36). Р. 878-887.
11. Fairclough N. Language and Power. N. Y.: Longman, 1989. 259 p.
12. Fairclough N., Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse as Social Interaction. L.: Sage, 1997. Р. 258-284.
13. Fiske J. Understanding Popular Culture. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2010. 206 p.
14. Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991. 301 p.
15. Hall S. Encoding and Decoding // Culture, Media, Language. L.: Hutchinson, 1980. Р. 117-127.
16. Hall S. The Rediscovery of “Ideology”: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies // Culture, Society and the Media. L.: Methuen, 1982. Р. 56-90.
17. Hodge R., Kress G., Trew T. Language and Control. L.: Routledge & K. Paul, 1979. 224 p.
18. Morley D. Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2005. 336 p.
19. Murdock G., Golding P. For a Political Economy of Mass Communications // The Socialist Register. L.: The Merlin Press, 1973. Vol. 10. Р. 205-234.
20. Phelan S. Reinvigorating Ideology Critique: between Trust and Suspicion // Media, Culture & Society. 2016. № 2 (38). Р. 274-283.
21. Raeijmaekers D., Maeseele P. In Objectivity We Trust? Pluralism, Consensus, and Ideology in Journalism Studies [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://jou.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/12/04/1464884915614244.abstract (дата обращения: 17.03.2017).
22. Smythe D. On the Audience Commodity and Its Work // Dependency Road: Communications, Capitalism, Consciousness, and Canada. Norwood: Ablex, 1981. Р. 22-51.
23. Thompson J. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990. 362 p.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Published: April 1, 2017.

Keywords

• СМИ
• критическая парадигма
• идеология
• политическая экономия
• дискурс-анализ
• аудитория
• технологии массовой коммуникации
• mass media
• critical paradigm
• ideology
• political economy
• discourse-analysis
• audience
• mass communication technologies

Copyright

© 2017 The Author(s)
© 2017 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)